Pandemics in Brooklyn: a view from 1918

Jen Hoyer

It’s hard to know which of these things is more unexpected: that, in a time of health crisis and desperate need for accurate information, my first instinct is to read the newspaper from 100 years ago; or that said news coverage has proved oddly comforting. If either of these instincts resonates with you as well, check out what the Brooklyn Daily Eagle shared about the 1918 influenza pandemic.

First of all: folks felt unsure about things. On September 18th, writing about “Influenza and Sports” (some things never change…), the Eagle reported that “Whether the influenza will flourish is a question that no one can answer.”

Everything changed quickly: by October 4th, 1918, there were 421 cases of the flu in Brooklyn; a public health crusade to stop spread of the disease included fining people for spitting in public. Note to self: can we fine people for not washing their hands?

Brooklyn Daily Eagle image about spitters being fined
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 4 Oct 1918

Quarantines and shutdowns were imposed: on October 10th, Camp Mills in Long Island was quarantined, and more distantly, Pennsylvania’s coal mines were shut down because, as workplaces, they were serving as points of high contagion. And yet, while the whole coal industry was alarmed by the huge drop in production, it mobilized medical workers to support sick employees.

Newspaper headline: Influenza Closes Many Collieries
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 15 Oct 1918

According to the Eagle, New York City had an estimated half a million cases by October 20, 1918. Even in our present moment of uncertainty around COVID19, that’s terrifying to me. The Health Department was quick to mobilize new strategies: they divided Brooklyn into twenty four “influenza districts,” with health workers assigned to support each district. Each of these districts also provided low-cost prepared meals to residents who were ill ("500,000 Grip Cases in New York City; Mortality is High," Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 20 Oct 1918.).

Read about how the State Food Commission set up operations to distribute food from an empty storefront in downtown Brooklyn:

Newspaper clipping with title, "Food Commission Aids Sick"
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 26 October 1918

And, just as now, there was a swirl of misinformation around the epidemic. A local swimming coach suggested that overeating was in part to blame for the epidemic ("Says Overfeeding is Cause of "Flu"," Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 21 December 1918), and an ad from the “Chiropractors of Brooklyn” suggested that spinal adjustment would help prevent infection. These serve as a solid reminder to be careful what information you believe, even from your trusty local newspaper.

Newspaper clipping with headline: "Chiropractic For Health"
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 28 Oct 1918

Public health mistakes abounded: even after the peak of the epidemic had passed, a new outbreak sprang up in Eastport, Long Island, after the Red Cross hosted a ball for 500 people but served lemonade and fruit punch to all the guests using a total of fifteen glasses.

There is no historic facepalm emoji emphatic enough to respond to this. We can do better, folks: avoid large public gatherings, and wash your dishes. ‘Nuf said.

Newspaper headline: ""Flu" Was at Party, Epidemic Follows"
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 19 December 1918

What blew my mind most was the timeline: while September 18, 1918 saw uncertainty that an epidemic would even hit, and October 4th saw a sudden spike in cases, by October 25th the local health authority declared that the worst was over. And, by November 1st,, rates of infection were dropping significantly.

Newspaper headline: "Influenza Crisis Passed in Brooklyn"
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 25 Oct 1918
Newspaper headline: "Big Drop Shown in Day's Influenza"
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 1 Nov 1918

I don’t think we should look to news reporting from 102 years ago for a clear indication of how our current health crisis will unfold. But if pandemics do follow patterns, then history reinforces some of the tips we’re receiving right now: avoid large gatherings, follow public hygiene standards, and be careful about the sources of health information you receive.

And maybe history can also guide and inspire us. While there’s no way to compare our current moment with 1918’s health crisis, I’m heartened by early twentieth century employers closing down workplaces and, in the midst of major revenue losses, providing healthcare to impacted employees. I’m impressed by the health departments of yore rethinking structures of community care provision in times of crisis and understanding the value of trying out new mechanisms for supporting their most vulnerable populations.

Perhaps my dive into the archive as a coping strategy for my current anxiety wasn’t off base after all. I’m sure the Brooklynites of 1918 would be heartened to know that Brooklyn today can learn from and be inspired by the ways they endured a pandemic.

 

This blog post reflects the opinions of the author and does not necessarily represent the views of Brooklyn Public Library.

 



June M

My Brooklyn grandmother died Nov 1920 of “exhaustion and pneumonia .” I was alway told it was Spanish Flu. Wasn’t that too late?
Fri, Apr 17 2020 7:50 pm Permalink
Stacey

Do you have anything on what NY basketball teams ( HS, College, Pro) did during the pandemic in 1918. When did they stop playing and for how long?
Thu, May 7 2020 11:58 pm Permalink

Post a Comment

While BPL encourages an open forum, posts and comments are moderated by library staff. BPL reserves the right, within its sole discretion, not to post and to remove submissions or comments that are unlawful or violate this policy. While comments will not be edited by BPL personnel, a comment may be deleted if it violates our comment policy.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
eNews Signup

Get the latest updates from BPL and be the first to know about new programs, author talks, exciting events and opportunities to support your local library.

Sign Up